Sample Evaluation Results

This is a sample preview of evaluation results, which will become available in early 2013. Please note that the contents (quantitative results) are specified by the Academic Senate, the questions will vary by school and department, and the appearance of this page is subject to change.

Peter Anteater

SAMPLE 1: A SAMPLE CLASS LEC (12345)

77.53% response rate (376/485)

Only quantitative responses are displayed—no questions with written responses are included.

  1. The course instructor shows enthusiasm for and is interested in the subject.
    • Mean 3.82
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.26
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    214 126 30 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
  2. The course instructor stimulates your interest in the subject.
    • Mean 3.77
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.43
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    219 122 18 14 2 6 0 2 1 1 1
  3. The course instructor meets stated objectives of the course.
    • Mean 3.90
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.21
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    200 82 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 90
  4. The course instructor is accessible and responsive.
    • Mean 3.61
    • Median 3.70
    • Std dev 0.48
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    121 86 39 10 29 1 6 0 0 0 45
  5. The course instructor creates an open and fair learning environment.
    • Mean 3.72
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.53
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    237 10 61 13 9 3 4 1 2 1 0
  6. The course instructor encourages students to think in this course.
    • Mean 2.77
    • Median 3.70
    • Std dev 1.64
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    204 84 35 33 9 0 10 7 0 123 0
  7. The course instructor's presentations and explanations of concepts were clear.
    • Mean 3.76
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.52
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    285 16 44 6 20 0 4 4 1 1 0
  8. Assignments and exams covered important aspects of the course.
    • Mean 3.74
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.36
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    213 67 94 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0
  9. What overall grade would you give this instructor?
    • Mean 3.22
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 1.46
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    304 20 43 4 7 0 4 0 0 75 0
  10. What overall grade would you give this course?
    • Mean 3.37
    • Median 4.00
    • Std dev 0.83
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) A- (3.7) B+ (3.3) B (3) B- (2.7) C+ (2.3) C (2) C- (1.7) D (1) F (0) NA
    193 0 98 23 11 5 23 26 0 5 1
  11. Based on completed assignments thus far, what is your current course grade or approximate standing?
    • Mean 2.45
    • Median 2.00
    • Std dev 0.86
    • Scale: 0.00 - 4.00
    A (4) B (3) C (2) D (1) F (0) NA
    23 0 75 1 0 1
  12. How much academic dishonesty seemed to occur in this course? If applicable, please describe the type of academic dishonesty that occurred (not the particular students involved).
    A lot Some A little None I could discern
    10 26 164 176
  13. How helpful were the textbooks and/or readings to your overall learning experience?
    Very Adequately Somewhat Not at all
    52 233 11 80
  14. How challenging was this course?
    Very Adequately Somewhat Not at all
    223 53 30 70